EAA enforcement is live in all 27 EU countries

Is your website breaking EU law?

Find out in 30 seconds. Access·Lens checks your site or Figma file against WCAG 2.2 AA and the European Accessibility Act, shows the 3 issues most likely to trigger a fine or a lawsuit, and hands your team the exact fix.

✓ EU fines up to €100,000 (Germany) and €1M (Spain) ✓ Thousands of US ADA web lawsuits every year ✓ Free, no signup, results in your browser

Scan my legal risk, free Check my Figma designs

For product managers who own the deadline, designers who own the UI, and developers who own the fix.

Sample risk X-ray

example-business.com

62

/100
WCAG 2.2 AA score · legal exposure: high

Critical Checkout button, no accessible name

Serious Body text, 3.2:1 contrast

Moderate Hero image, missing alt text

Mapped to EAA Annex I & EN 301 549 · PDF + Excel export

Audit input

Auditing…

Fetching page

Hmm, that didn't work.

Why does fetching fail? ▾

Browsers block cross-site fetches for security. We try (1) a local proxy.php on your server first, then (2) public CORS relays as a fallback. If both fail, the target site likely blocks scraping or your host blocks outbound calls. Fix: upload proxy.php next to index.html (webempresa supports PHP out of the box), or just paste the HTML.

Access·Lens Pro

Fix every issue. Prove it to legal.

✓ Every finding on every page, with production-ready fix code
✓ Full EAA Annex I and EN 301 549 cross-walk
✓ Formal EAA Compliance Report (PDF + Excel) for legal and procurement
✓ Developer fix guide, PM remediation plan and AI fix prompts
✓ Your company logo on every report

€49

Access·Lens Pro

per month · cancel anytime in PayPal

Less than one hour of an accessibility consultant. A fraction of a single EAA fine.

Upgrade

€49/mo

Pay with PayPal, Debit Card, or Credit Card

Checkout runs on paypal.com. PayPal handles every keystroke; we never see or store card or account data. Buyers paying by card stay as guests, no signup.

Already subscribed? Unlock Pro on this browser

Find the transaction ID in the receipt email PayPal sends right after payment. It is roughly 17 alphanumeric characters.

✓

Access·Lens Pro is active.

Every finding, the EAA cross-walk and all reports are unlocked.

Billing details for invoice

Your name Company (optional) Email Tax ID / VAT / NIF (optional) Address (optional)

Saved locally, never sent anywhere. Used only to populate your invoice PDF.

03 → your report

Results

,

EAA score

,

Perceivable

,

Operable

,

Understandable

,

Robust

,

Critical

0

Serious

0

Moderate

0

Minor

0

Why this audit matters · EAA evidence base , click to expand

109M

Europeans with disabilities (2010 baseline). Projected to reach 142M by 2050.

EAA IA Annex 3, L.1074, L.1248

66%

of Europeans would pay more for products if they were more accessible.

Eurobarometer, EAA IA L.317

85%

want the right to complain and seek sanctions against non-compliant providers.

Eurobarometer, EAA IA L.325

1–2%

maximum extra dev cost to make hardware/software fully accessible.

EAA IA L.1762

"Specific requirements are more likely to exist for services than for goods, for public sector provision than for private sector provision… Technical standards are more likely to be voluntary than compulsory, or may refer loosely to international guidelines.", ANED 2012 Summary findings.

Access·Lens converts that loose, voluntary, jurisdiction-varying guidance into a concrete, dated, machine-verifiable report, aligned to WCAG 2.1 AA via EN 301 549 V3.2.1 §9, with EAA Annex I Functional Performance Criteria mapped under the ANED three-tier classification (general obligation · specific requirement · detailed technical specification).

04 → EAA cross-walk

Annex I, Section III

How findings map to the European Accessibility Act's requirements for digital services.

04b → Functional Performance Criteria

EAA Annex I, Section VII

The 11 categories of user need that the EAA requires every covered product and service to address. Each row links to the WCAG 2.1 success criteria Access·Lens uses to verify it.

04c → Documentation trail

Evidence the EAA expects you to keep

Eight artefacts every economic operator must retain to demonstrate compliance under Directive (EU) 2019/882. Access·Lens generates the technical-documentation row; the rest is the operator's responsibility.

#	Artefact	EAA reference	Provided by Access·Lens?
1	Technical documentation, which requirements are met, how, and with what evidence.	Art. 14 + Annex IV	✓ EAA Report
2	EU declaration of conformity, signed self-declaration that the product/service meets EAA requirements.	Art. 16 + Annex IV	Template
3	CE marking, affixed to products covered by the EAA (e.g. self-service terminals, e-readers, smartphones).	Art. 17–18	Out of scope (physical product)
4	Disproportionate-burden assessment, written justification if you invoke Art. 14 carve-out.	Art. 14	Worksheet
5	Conformity-assessment procedure records, for products only, internal production-control checks.	Annex IV	Operator-maintained
6	Market-surveillance cooperation records, correspondence with national enforcement authorities.	Art. 19–22	Operator-maintained
7	Five-year retention period for technical documentation.	Art. 14(8)	Operator-maintained
8	Periodic re-audit, accessibility degrades over time; recommended cadence every 3 / 6 / 12 months.	EAA IA L.3954	✓ Schedulable

04e → EN 301 549 chapter coverage

Harmonised-standard footprint

Which sections of EN 301 549 V3.2.1 (the EU harmonised standard for ICT accessibility) this audit touches. Section §9, Web is the workhorse for URL crawls; §10 covers any PDFs/Office docs linked from the page; §11 applies when scanning a Figma design or codebase.

§5 Generic

Closed functionality, biometrics, privacy of accessibility features.

SST / kiosk preset

§6 Voice comms

Two-way voice communication, RTT, hearing-aid coupling.

Telephony surfaces

§7 Video

Captioning, audio description, subtitle controls.

Embedded media

§8 Hardware

Keypad layout, tactile cues, headphone jacks, height/reach.

Out of scope (physical)

§9 Web ★

Maps WCAG 2.1 A & AA. Primary citation surface for URL audits.

Active for this audit

§10 Non-web docs

PDFs, Office documents linked from the page.

Document checks active

§11 Software

Native apps. Maps to WCAG via WCAG2ICT.

Out of scope for URL audits

§12 Documentation

Product manuals, installation/maintenance info.

Operator-supplied

§13 Relay / 112

Emergency services, total conversation.

Public-sector audits

04d → National frameworks

Country profiles & legal basis

Pre-EAA national accessibility laws and standards, sourced from ANED 2012's pan-European survey. Useful for procurement and tender clauses that pre-date the EAA's 28 June 2025 effective date.

Country	Legal basis	Standard	Level	Scope

Source: ANED 2012 national accessibility requirements survey (Mark Priestley, European Commission VT/2007/005).

05 → Second opinion

Compare in other audit tools.

Automated tools detect 30–50% of WCAG issues. Cross-check findings with these well-known auditors, links open with your audited URL pre-filled where supported.

06 → Test with real users' tools

Assistive technology guide.

The four main accessibility needs are visual, hearing, motor and cognitive. Try your site with the same tools real users rely on.

Vision

Screen readers

✓ NVDA, free, Windows
✓ JAWS, Windows, industry standard
✓ VoiceOver, built into macOS / iOS (⌘ F5)
✓ ChromeVox, Chrome extension
✓ TalkBack, built into Android

Vision · low-vision

Magnifiers & contrast

✓ Windows Magnifier (Win + +)
✓ macOS Zoom (System Settings → Accessibility → Zoom)
✓ Colorblindly, colour-vision simulation
✓ CCA, Colour Contrast Analyser
✓ Use the comfort widget (bottom-right of this page) to try high contrast and dyslexia font live

Motor

Input alternatives

✓ Dragon NaturallySpeaking, voice control
✓ Built-in voice control (macOS Voice Control, Windows Speech Recognition)
✓ Switch-control devices & sip-and-puff hardware
✓ Test: tab through every interactive element, Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, Space, arrow keys

Hearing

Captions & transcripts

✓ Live Caption, real-time captions on Chrome / Android
✓ Otter.ai, AI transcripts
✓ Check: all video has captions (live and pre-recorded), all audio has a transcript

Cognitive

Reading aids

✓ Helperbird, dyslexia, ADHD reading support
✓ Reader views in browsers
✓ Hemingway Editor, plain-language checker
✓ Check: use plain language, consistent navigation, error prevention

For everyone

Always test with real users.

Automated tools catch the obvious; lived experience catches the rest. Pay disabled users to test your product, services like Fable, Applause DPN, and Knowbility connect teams with assistive-tech users.

Accessibility tools

Is your website breaking EU law?

Monitor every interface that can trigger EAA exposure.

Fix every issue. Prove it to legal.

Results

Send yourself a copy

Re-audit in 3 months

Annex I, Section III

EAA Annex I, Section VII

Evidence the EAA expects you to keep

Harmonised-standard footprint

Country profiles & legal basis

Compare in other audit tools.

Assistive technology guide.

Screen readers

Magnifiers & contrast

Input alternatives

Captions & transcripts

Reading aids

Always test with real users.

Free risk scan.
Full compliance with Pro.

Start free. Upgrade when legal asks.

Three steps. Roughly a minute.

Audit

Map

Report

From principles
to clauses.

Is your website breaking EU law?

Monitor every interface that can trigger EAA exposure.

Fix every issue. Prove it to legal.

Results

Send yourself a copy

Re-audit in 3 months

Annex I, Section III

EAA Annex I, Section VII

Evidence the EAA expects you to keep

Harmonised-standard footprint

Country profiles & legal basis

Compare in other audit tools.

Assistive technology guide.

Screen readers

Magnifiers & contrast

Input alternatives

Captions & transcripts

Reading aids

Always test with real users.

Free risk scan.Full compliance with Pro.

Start free. Upgrade when legal asks.

Three steps. Roughly a minute.

Audit

Map

Report

From principlesto clauses.

Free risk scan.
Full compliance with Pro.

From principles
to clauses.